- Aur-requests - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-requests] [PRQ#2] Request Closed
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 01 Jul '14

01 Jul '14

Request #2 has been closed by cryptocrack [1]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/cryptocrack/

1 0

[aur-requests] [PRQ#2] Deletion Request for aurdupes
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 01 Jul '14

01 Jul '14

cryptocrack [1] filed a deletion request for aurdupes [2]: This is just a test. Please ignore. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/cryptocrack/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/aurdupes/

1 0

[aur-requests] FW: deletion request mingw-w64-getrusage
by xantares 09 01 Jul '14

01 Jul '14

From: xantares09(a)hotmail.com To: aur-general(a)archlinux.org Subject: deletion request mingw-w64-getrusage Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 12:17:07 +0000 Hello, Could someone delete mingw-w64-getrusage: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-getrusage/ I've renamed it to mingw-w64-resource. Regards, xan.

1 0

[aur-requests] Disownment: xfce-theme-greybird-git
by Izumi Natsuka 01 Jul '14

01 Jul '14

Hello, Please disown the package xfce-theme-greybird-git[0], as it has been flagged out-of-date since 2014-03-17 and I emailed to the maintainer on 2014-05-07 but still get no response. I think the PKGBUILD should be updated to at least v1.3.4 for fixing the dual-titlebar/shadow issue[1]. [0]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfce-theme-greybird-git [1]: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/GTK%2B#Client-side_decorations Izumi Natsuka

2 1

Re: [aur-requests] [aur-general] Orphan request: jdownloader2
by Marcel Dopita 01 Jul '14

01 Jul '14

Still no response after a month. Could you orphan it? Regards, Marcel On 31. 5. 2014 16:34, Patrick Burroughs (Celti) wrote: > On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 7:13 AM, Marcel Dopita <m(a)rcel.cz> wrote: >> The package jdownloader2 is outdated for more than 4 months now. Owner does >> not list his email so I wasn't able to contact him directly. Exactly two >> weeks ago I left a comment on AUR and also sent private message to user with >> same name on official jdownloader board. Both with no response. > His email is listed in his AUR profile. I've CCed him on this so that > he has a chance to respond. > > Regards, > ~Celti

2 1

[aur-requests] Merge request: crosstool-ng-hg into crosstool-ng-git
by Ivan Shapovalov 01 Jul '14

01 Jul '14

Please merge crosstool-ng-hg[1] into crosstool-ng-git[2]. Reason: upstream has switched their VCS[3]. [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/crosstool-ng-hg/ [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/crosstool-ng-git/ [3]: http://crosstool-ng.org/#news Thanks, -- Ivan Shapovalov / intelfx /

2 1

[aur-requests] Orphan request: python-pyspf
by Rich Li 30 Jun '14

30 Jun '14

Hi, The package python-pyspf [1] has been flagged out of date since 2014-05-24. In the comments I've posted an updated PKGBUILD and have tested it out. I emailed the maintainer on 2014-06-11 asking him to update or disown the package but have not received a response. Can this package be disowned so I can update it? [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-pyspf/ Thanks, -- Rich

2 1

[aur-requests] merge request: merge python2-oslo-sphinx into python-oslosphinx
by Lance Chen 28 Jun '14

28 Jun '14

Hello TUs, Since upstream had renamed oslo.sphinx to oslosphinx, I think it would be less confused that we rename python2-oslo-sphinx to python-oslosphinx. Split packages are also applied to support both python and python2. Please merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-oslo-sphinx/ into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-oslosphinx/. Thank you very much. Cheers, Lance Chen

2 1

[aur-requests] orphan request: geeqie-git
by Steven Honeyman 28 Jun '14

28 Jun '14

I've tried several times to contact this package maintainer of geeqie-git[1], but with no response. It has not been updated since 2012. It's been longer than the required 14 days, so could someone please orphan it so that I can adopt and update? Thanks, Steven. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/geeqie-git

2 1

[aur-requests] Removal request: stxxl and stxxl-svn.
by Karol Blazewicz 28 Jun '14

28 Jun '14

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libstxxl/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/stxxl/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/stxxl-svn/ The latter two are orphaned, none has any votes. stxxl seems to be using git and not svn anymore http://stxxl.sourceforge.net/ -> https://github.com/stxxl/stxxl [2] has been submitted by the same person as [1], so I guess he decided to change the name. Their PKGBUILDs differ a bit though. Can we keep [1] and remove [2] and [3]?

2 1