- Aur-requests - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-requests] [PRQ#10794] Merge Request for greenclip
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 05 Mar '18

05 Mar '18

Erebe [1] filed a request to merge greenclip [2] into rofi-greenclip [3]: In order to this package to get easier to find (it is a plugin for the rofi program) I want it to be merged into the newly created rofi- greenclip package. Thanks for Aur :) [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Erebe/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/greenclip/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/rofi-greenclip/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#10812] Deletion Request for pachook-rstudio-ligatures
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 05 Mar '18

05 Mar '18

flying-sheep [1] filed a deletion request for pachook-rstudio- ligatures [2]: It’s part of RStudio now [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/flying-sheep/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/pachook-rstudio-ligatures/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#10815] Deletion Request for python-guessit-204
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 05 Mar '18

05 Mar '18

cgirard [1] filed a deletion request for python-guessit-204 [2]: This was needed by flexget-git which would not work with newer guessit version. This has been fixed by upstream. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/cgirard/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python-guessit-204/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#10816] Deletion Request for python-rebulk-082
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 05 Mar '18

05 Mar '18

cgirard [1] filed a deletion request for python-rebulk-082 [2]: This was needed by flexget-git which would not work with newer rebulk version. This has been fixed by upstream. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/cgirard/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python-rebulk-082/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#10810] Deletion Request for peppercarrot-fonts-git
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 05 Mar '18

05 Mar '18

midgard [1] filed a deletion request for peppercarrot-fonts-git [2]: Can't be pulled from Git directly any more; repo has been merged with several other ones, it's too large to download it all just for the fonts. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/midgard/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/peppercarrot-fonts-git/

1 1

[aur-requests] Follow up to: [PRQ#10808] Deletion Request for wine-staging-dev
by Daniel Bermond 05 Mar '18

05 Mar '18

After I've placed this deletion request, the maintainer of the package wine-staging-dev pushed a new commit adding the wine-nine patches in order to make it different from my package wine-staging-git, probably trying to escape from the deletion. Even after this, I think that this package should be deleted. This would avoid confusion to users seeking the pure wine-staging VCS (development) package because the package names are quite the same and express the same thing. The AUR wiki page says that the package name should express in what is it modified for. Quote from the wiki: "Exception to this strict rule may only be packages having extra features enabled and/or patches in comparison to the official ones. In such an occasion the pkgname should be different to express that difference." If it would not be deleted, I think that it should be at least renamed to something else, like wine-staging-nine-git, or something similiar. Best regards, -- Daniel M. Bermond e-Mail: danielbermond(a)gmail.com

2 2

[aur-requests] [PRQ#10808] Deletion Request for wine-staging-dev
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 04 Mar '18

04 Mar '18

dbermond [1] filed a deletion request for wine-staging-dev [2]: This package is a clone of my package wine-staging-git. In my opinion, it does not need to exist. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/dbermond/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wine-staging-dev/

1 1

[aur-requests] Follow up to: [PRQ#10808] Deletion Request for wine-staging-dev
by Daniel Bermond 04 Mar '18

04 Mar '18

After I've placed this deletion request, the maintainer of the package wine-staging-dev pushed a new commit adding the wine-nine patches in order to make it different from my package wine-staging-git, probably trying to escape from the deletion. Even after this, I think that this package should be deleted. This would avoid confusion to users seeking the pure wine-staging VCS (development) package because the package names are quite the same and express the same thing. The AUR wiki page says that the package name should express in what is it modified for. Quote from the wiki: "Exception to this strict rule may only be packages having extra features enabled and/or patches in comparison to the official ones. In such an occasion the pkgname should be different to express that difference." If it would not be deleted, I think that it should be at least renamed to something else, like wine-staging-nine-git, or something similiar. Best regards, -- Daniel M. Bermond e-Mail: danielbermond(a)gmail.com

1 0

[aur-requests] [PRQ#10806] Deletion Request for deepin-wine32-tools-git
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 04 Mar '18

04 Mar '18

FabioLolix [1] filed a deletion request for deepin-wine32-tools-git [2]: duplicate of deepin-wine32-tools and not a git package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/deepin-wine32-tools/ [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/FabioLolix/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/deepin-wine32-tools-git/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#10800] Deletion Request for deepin-libwine-git
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 04 Mar '18

04 Mar '18

FabioLolix [1] filed a deletion request for deepin-libwine-git [2]: Duplicate of deepin-libwine and not a -git package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/deepin-libwine/ [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/FabioLolix/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/deepin-libwine-git/

1 1