- Aur-requests - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-requests] [PRQ#4400] Merge Request for vapoursynth-plugin-zimg-git
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 22 Nov '15

22 Nov '15

sl1pkn07 [1] filed a request to merge vapoursynth-plugin-zimg-git [2] into zimg-git [3]: no need anymore because in the next vapoursynth release is used like a lib instead of a only a extenal plugin. please merge in the new renamed package [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/sl1pkn07/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/vapoursynth-plugin-zimg-git/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/zimg-git/

1 0

[aur-requests] [PRQ#4399] Merge Request for softmaker-office-bin
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 21 Nov '15

21 Nov '15

jdarch [1] filed a request to merge softmaker-office-bin [2] into softmaker-office-2012-bin [3]: For users who want to stay at their version, or wish to install multiple versions, it is more convenient to be able to use packages with names dependent on their version. Therefore I would suggest merging softmaker-office-bin into softmaker-office-2012-bin, and future versions (e.g. 2016, 2020... wherever it may end) bear their main version number in the package name. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/jdarch/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/softmaker-office-bin/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/softmaker-office-2012-bin/

1 0

[aur-requests] [PRQ#4398] Request Rejected
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 21 Nov '15

21 Nov '15

Request #4398 has been rejected by keenerd [1]: Sorry. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/keenerd/

1 0

[aur-requests] [PRQ#4398] Orphan Request for slurm
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 21 Nov '15

21 Nov '15

ava1ar [1] filed a orphan request for slurm [2]: No update withing a month. CUrrent maintainer doesn't respond to comments. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/ava1ar/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/slurm/

1 0

[aur-requests] [PRQ#4397] Deletion Request for bfg-repo-cleaner
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 21 Nov '15

21 Nov '15

Skatox [1] filed a deletion request for bfg-repo-cleaner [2]: This is true, bfg is a better PKGBUILD [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Skatox/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/bfg-repo-cleaner/

1 0

[aur-requests] [PRQ#4396] Deletion Request for wuala-daemon
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 21 Nov '15

21 Nov '15

andreyv [1] filed a deletion request for wuala-daemon [2]: Wuala has shut down: https://www.wuala.com/ [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/andreyv/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wuala-daemon/

1 0

[aur-requests] [PRQ#4395] Deletion Request for wuala
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 21 Nov '15

21 Nov '15

andreyv [1] filed a deletion request for wuala [2]: Wuala has shut down: https://www.wuala.com/ [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/andreyv/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wuala/

1 0

[aur-requests] [PRQ#4394] Deletion Request for mint-backgrounds-rosa
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 21 Nov '15

21 Nov '15

Muflone [1] filed a deletion request for mint-backgrounds-rosa [2]: Please don't pollute the AUR with backgrounds that can be grabbed from the net without any system-wide installation need [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Muflone/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/mint-backgrounds-rosa/

1 0

[aur-requests] [PRQ#4387] Request Accepted
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 21 Nov '15

21 Nov '15

Request #4387 has been accepted by allspark [1]: The user allspark disowned the package. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/allspark/

1 0

Re: [aur-requests] [aur-general] [aur-dev] [PRQ#4382] Deletion Request for b43-firmware
by Xavion 21 Nov '15

21 Nov '15

If we wish to continue using the word "file" in this context, "File Request" should be changed to "File a Request". This would prevent native English speakers from misinterpreting our use of "file" as a noun. Having said that, I still feel that "lodge" is a more appropriate term in this situation. The main reason, and I hope you're concentrating this time Mark, is that there's no double meaning (i.e. noun vs verb). For people who don't like "Lodge a Request", there's always "Make a Request". In fact, I imagine most similar websites would use the latter term in preference to either of the two mentioned alternatives. Regardless, clinging to the textbook and saying that nothing needs to be changed is too rigid and impractical. We're not doing a maths test here! This is all about practicality and cutting down on confusion.

1 0