On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Maxime Gauduin <alucryd@archlinux.org> wrote:


On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Levente Polyak <anthraxx@archlinux.org> wrote:
On 09/15/2015 09:27 PM, notify@aur.archlinux.org wrote:
> SanskritFritz [1] filed a deletion request for fish-git [2]:
>
> Gitorius is gone, this package is deprecated anyway long time.
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/SanskritFritz/
> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/fish-git/
>

Wouldn't it make more sense to keep fish-git and merge figh-shell-git
into the first one? The official fish package in the community
repository is named 'fish', it sounds more appropriate to have a
matching name for the VCS package.

Indeed, as long as the package in [community] is called fish, its git counterpart in AUR must be called fish-git. There is very little chance that, in the future, anything other than this shell will be called fish anyway, I believe it is fine to keep fish{,-git} as package name rather than changing it to fish-shell{,-git}.

Yes, that is why I requested a delete, so that we can rename fish-shell-git into fish-git.
Should I request for a merge now?