That was my read too. Can this be reverted? I don't think this merge was the right call, thanks. On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 11:43 AM xiota <aur@mentalfossa.com> wrote:
python-docformatter seems to qualify as "a program that is strongly coupled to the Python ecosystem".
From ArchWiki Python package guidelines [a]:
Python 3 library modules, use python-modulename. Also use the prefix if the package provides a program that is strongly coupled to the Python ecosystem (e.g. pip or tox). For other applications, use only the program name.
[a]: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Python_package_guidelines
On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 8:12 AM Guillaume Horel <guillaume.horel@gmail.com> wrote:
This seems like a pretty bogus reason. There are plenty of python packages which have a bin entry point with a python- name. Is that an official arch policy? This package is mostly used as a library.
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 1:03 AM <notify@aur.archlinux.org> wrote:
Xeonacid [1] filed a request to merge python-docformatter [2] into docformatter [3]:
The package has a binary at `/usr/bin/docformatter`, it should not have a `python-` prefix which is for pure library.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Xeonacid/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python-docformatter/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/docformatter/