That makes sense. I'll make sure to rename my package as soon as I get home from work. Thanks! :) Best regards, Jeremy. On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 11:35 PM, Óscar García Amor <ogarcia@moire.org> wrote:
Ok, then in this case the name of package is wrong. Must be openshift-origin-server-bin to avoid the confusion with the client, must provide origin-client-bin and have conflicts with them.
I think that there is a little mess with the names of packages. IMHO the packages must be renamed as: - origin-client-bin -> openshift-origin-client-bin - openshift-origin-bin -> openshift-origin-server-bin - openshift-source-to-image -> openshift-origin-source-to-image-bin - openshift-origin-git -> openshift-origin-server-git
The rest of openshift packages are duplicates: openshift-origin-client-tools (outdated and newer than his duplicate) is the same that origin-client-bin openshift-origin-source-to-image (outdated and newer than his duplicate) is the same that openshift-source-to-image
Greetings.
2017-07-04 20:54 GMT+02:00 Jeremy Asuncion <jeremyasuncion808@gmail.com>:
origin-client-bin only includes the client tool, oc. openshift-origin-bin includes the openshift server.
Thanks! :)
Best regards, Jeremy.
On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 4:28 AM, <notify@aur.archlinux.org> wrote:
ogarcia [1] filed a request to merge openshift-origin-bin [2] into origin-client-bin [3]:
Are the same package
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/ogarcia/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/openshift-origin-bin/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/origin-client-bin/
-- Óscar García Amor | ogarcia at moire.org | http://ogarcia.me