Marcell Meszaros <marcell.meszaros@runbox.eu> 於 2023年7月30日 週日 下午6:20寫道：
@yan12125, why did you reject the deletion request for this duplicate?
AUR/autopsy also uses the precompiled Java bytecode as source.
So the two packages are truly duplicates, the only difference is that autopsy-bin is 1 year older and flagged OOD for that period.
On 30 July 2023 11:05:20 GMT+02:00, notify@aur.archlinux.org wrote:
Request #42786 has been Rejected by yan12125 [1]:
This is a java application so the suffix '-bin' is not necessary anyway.
Java packages can be either built from sources or binaries as well.
autopsy-bin is a better package name for a package built from binaries. Therefore, orphaning and updating autospy-bin is better than deleting autospy-bin. After that, autospy can be merged into autospy-bin in case it is not changed to be built from sources. Best, Chih-Hsuan Yen (yan12125)