Le 14/02/2017 à 15:12, notify@aur.archlinux.org a écrit :
mortzprk [1] filed a deletion request for nixnote2-git [2]:
There is updated version of software available in AUR. this should be deleted
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/mortzprk/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/nixnote2-git/
Added maintainer of nixnote and last packager/submitter of nixnote2-git. Hum, this whole nixnote thing seems to be a mess. First, a -git package has every rights to exist in AUR independently of the non-git package. Next, currently we have: – nixnote, pointing to 1.6 but flagged out-of-date because of 2.0 release; – nixnote-beta, pointing to the latest beta of the 2.0 branch, which is now outdated. Should this package remain? – nixnote2, which points toward 2.0 and was pushed today; – nixnote2-git, which builds from git. Unless there is a particular reason to keep nixnote 1.x alongside nixnote 2.x, which doesn’t seems to be the case, this is the course of action I’ll go with: – nixnote2 gets deleted right away; – nixnote-beta gets deleted by the end of the week unless someone says it’s still usefull; – nixnote2-git gets deleted by the end of the week if no one pushes a correct nixnote-git package, else it gets merged into that one. Please answer the point on 1.x vs 2.x ASAP. ;) Regards, Bruno