Is this standardised convention? Happy to switch mine to compiling from source if so.
On Sunday, 28 February 2016 16:13:36 GMT Jameson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 8:30 PM email@example.com wrote:
tjbp  filed a deletion request for shashlik-bin :
This package already exists under "shashlik". Could do with a shashlik-git package, however.
 https://aur.archlinux.org/account/tjbp/  https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/shashlik-bin/
If we remove my -bin package, shashlik should be renamed since it is built from a binary package, and not source.