Hello,Scarlett Haxie

    In fact, I also think so, but I often received comments to the effect that the bin file already exists, asking me to delete the appimage package I've submitted. This also includes trusted users. I personally preferd the appimage package, which actually takes up less space than the bin package. But currently there seems to be no consensus on the understanding of the bin and appimage packages, which is why I have to do so.   

在 2023/6/30 08:43, Scarlett Haxie 写道:

I really have to ask, why is it that you hate appimages?

You don't seem to understand that a -bin package and an -appimage package are *not* the same, and do not serve the same purpose. Please stop submitting these ridiculous requests on your noble quest to rid the world of appimages, some of us use them and having to transfer every single one of the programs I use that are in appimage format that you recklessly have removed from the AUR into my own seperate repo is getting incredibly tedious and boring.

On Fri, 30 Jun 2023, 01:17 , <notify@aur.archlinux.org> wrote:

zxp19821005 [1] filed a deletion request for beaker-ng-appimage [2]:

use bin(https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/beaker-ng-bin) instead.

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/zxp19821005/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/beaker-ng-appimage/