> The package in community provides the dynamic arch version, whereas this one will be specifically tuned for your current architecture.

But this is not a good enough reason to keep PKGBUILDs for the same source in both Arch repo and on AUR.

Arch is not a binary-only distribution: all the build scripts are availabe.

One can always grab a couple of PKGBUILDs from Arch repo's GitLab for fine-tuned, microarchitecture-optimized rebuild, if that is what they want.

But AUR submission guidelines are quite clear: they don't mention allowing duplication for this purpose.

On 2 July 2023 17:34:03 GMT+02:00, Guillaume Horel <guillaume.horel@gmail.com> wrote:

This is not the exactly the same package. The package in community provides the dynamic arch version, whereas this one will be specifically tuned for your current architecture.
I've responded in the comments that there is nothing broken at the moment with this package, and I don't see the need to delete it.

On Sun, Jul 2, 2023 at 7:17 AM <notify@aur.archlinux.org> wrote:
MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for openblas-lapack [2]:

Same package is now in [extra], named blas-openblas:

https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/blas-openblas/

See announcement about it:
https://archlinux.org/news/openblas-0323-2-update-requires-manual-
intervention/

I have notified AUR maintainers in comments about their need to review
this change, and possibly adapt their PKGBUILD's.

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/openblas-lapack/