17 Dec
2017
17 Dec
'17
10:41 p.m.
Levente Polyak via aur-requests <aur-requests@archlinux.org> hat am 17. Dezember 2017 um 19:22 geschrieben:
Since when do we add stable to package names, that should always be the default and we mark anything nonstable, devel or ancient otherwise. Please do it the other way around and continue work on monodevelop I thought the same but then I noticed the "profile" is called "stable". Not sure if that's enough to warrant the package naming.