oh, I got it. will be careful next time:) пн, 9 мар. 2020 г., 12:59 Jonas Witschel <diabonas@archlinux.org>:
On 2020-03-09 01:11, notify--- via aur-requests wrote:
dviktor [1] filed a deletion request for r-gdal [2]:
package name is invalid. the right one is r-rgdal
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/dviktor/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/r-gdal/
While I agree with the renames proposed in PRQ#18272 through PRQ#18276, it is considered good form to bring up such issues in the package comments first to give the current maintainers a chance to deal with the rename themselves.
Given that you have already uploaded fresh packages under the new names today, I suggest adding the current maintainers of the old packages as co-maintainers of the new packages: at least some of them appear to be active, e.g. r-gdal was updated just today.
Procedurally it would be better to have filed merge requests instead of deletion requests to merge the old into the new name: this preserves votes and comments and gives a clearer indication of what happened to the old package.
Best regards, Jonas