Le 17/05/2015 23:45, Johannes Löthberg a écrit :
On 17/05, Johannes Löthberg wrote:
On 17/05, email@example.com wrote:
ArchangeGabriel  filed a deletion
request for exfalso :
I need to reupload this package with a pkgbase (quodlibet)
and AFAIK, this goes through removal of the existing package.
Could you upload a quodlibet package without the exfalso split
package in it and then request a merge if you want the new
package to keep the votes and comments?
Actually, scratch that, you won't be able to upload a quodlibet
package because it exists in the repos and the repo package has
exfalso in it. Is there anything different at all in this
Indeed. It’s exfalso without quodlibet (I only use the former, and a
lot of other people too), another way to do this would be splitting
the repo package into four (or more, if splitting l10n):
– quodlibet-libs, on which one the previous two should
– quodlibet-l10n with /usr/share/locale files (and, as said
above, eventually split that one for each locale)
Should I open a bug against quodlibet packaging on Arch?