On 01/30/2017 06:15 PM, Kieran Colford wrote:
No one as expressed a valid reason for removal aside from an unclear purpose. I have corrected that now so it should be fine.
This doesn't appear to have made its way to the aur-requests ML, I assume kcolford is not subscribed and therefore his email was rejected. And I am pretty sure this package is still just as useless as it was before the pkgesc was modified, given that rewording it to say the same thing does not actually add a new purpose that wasn't there before. I suggest that people who want to use bauerbill should go ahead and do so, rather than feeling some sort of psychological need to type "pacaur" into their interactive shell prompt in preference to "bauerbill". And if you really need that psychological need, then ~/.bashrc is your friend; stop uploading your personal aliases to the AUR. As for "satisfy[ing] any dependencies on pacaur", I cannot imagine why you would need such a thing, since pacaur is not the type of package that other packages would be depending on. Except for multiply-layered AUR helpers, which 1) shouldn't exist, and 2) should have interchangeable backends for their multiply-layered bad idea, so file an upstream bug. -- Eli Schwartz