Hi dakataca,

I also left (part of) this message on the package, just in case you aren't on the mailing list or something.

Why exactly was this request created? I don't see a case where these should be merged to be honest.
The spflahtool5 [3] package was created way after spflashtol5-bin [2] and I'm unable to see why. The more logical thing seems to be a deletion of spflashtool5 [3] as a duplicate.
If you're providing a variant with different options, they shouldn't be merged either; in that case, update it to clearly reflect what the differences are.

If you have any suggestions or improvements for spflashtool5-bin [2], feel free to leave a comment there or send me a message.

Kind regards,
Omar

On do, okt 19 2023 at 16:41:35 +00:00:00, notify@aur.archlinux.org wrote:
dakataca [1] filed a request to merge spflashtool5-bin [2] into spflashtool5 [3]: It would be a good idea to combine the best of both PKGBUILDs, and the same version of spflashtool. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/dakataca/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/spflashtool5-bin/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/spflashtool5/