* Bruno Pagani <bruno.n.pagani@gmail.com> [2017-02-14 16:59:10 +0100]:
Le 08/02/2017 à 22:16, notify@aur.archlinux.org a écrit :
The-Compiler [1] filed a deletion request for pdf.js [2]:
Duplicate of pdfjs (without dot) which was first submitted 10 months earlier (and has packages optdepending on it)
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/The-Compiler/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/pdf.js/
Indeed, but pdf.js seems like a more correct package name in fact. Could you agree on the maintainership of it, and file a merge request of pdfjs to pdf.js instead?
I'd be fine either way, but [1] says: For the sake of consistency, pkgname should match the name of the source tarball of the software: for instance, if the software is in foobar-2.5.tar.gz, use pkgname=foobar. And the name used in their release tarballs[2] is "pdfjs". [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PKGBUILD [2] https://github.com/mozilla/pdf.js/releases/download/v1.7.225/pdfjs-1.7.225-d... Florian -- http://www.the-compiler.org | me@the-compiler.org (Mail/XMPP) GPG: 916E B0C8 FD55 A072 | http://the-compiler.org/pubkey.asc I love long mails! | http://email.is-not-s.ms/