I went ahead and "updated" the PKGBUILD because namcap reports "custom: " in the license field as wrong ALBEIT the Pcakge Guidelines published in the wiki declare otherwise...sigh. On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 6:43 AM <nmlibertarian@gmail.com> wrote:
RE: Orphan request for trustedqsl - PRQ#60221
In fact this package already conforms to the Package Guidelines, as currently published:
" For custom licenses the identifier should be either LicenseRef-license-name or custom:license-name, if they are not covered by the common families mentioned above. The corresponding license text must be placed in directory /usr/share/licenses/pkgname. To install the file a following code snippet may be used in package() section:
install -Dm644 LICENSE "$pkgdir/usr/share/licenses/$pkgname/LICENSE" "
Please DO NOT orphan this package.
TIA
not_anonymous
On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 6:13 AM <notify@aur.archlinux.org> wrote:
Coelacanthus [1] filed an orphan request for trustedqsl [2]:
This package doesn't follow licenses section of Package Guideline and RFC 16. I submitted a comment on AUR but received no response or update for four months.
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/PKGBUILD#license https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/rfcs/-/blob/master/rfcs/0016-spdx- license-identifiers.rst <https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/rfcs/-/blob/master/rfcs/0016-spdx-license-identifiers.rst>
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Coelacanthus/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/trustedqsl/