Hi all,

This request has been rejected by Muflone, and I don't quite understand; is there a reason to keep these packages around?

I'm pretty sure my packages in the AUR have been superseded by Laurent Carlier's (lcarlier/lordheavy) in [extra], and can only confuse users.

Cheers,

Eric

On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 12:45 AM, <notify@aur.archlinux.org> wrote:

1ace [1] filed a deletion request for vulkan [2]:

extra/vulkan-sdk & extra/vulkan-icd-loader replace these vulkan-sdk &
vulkan-loader.

Not sure what to do about the different name though; should I push an
update with the new name (vulkan-icd-loader) and `replaces=(vulkan-
loader)` to make those who installed my package use the new name, and
in a week (when hopefully people have upgraded to the new name)
actually delete this one?

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/1ace/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/vulkan/