Apparently a package that I regularly maintained for over 3 years and was the most popular Octoprint package is not even worth a comment before wiping out. I am extremely disappointed by that reaction! Now only the 'octoprint' package is left, with the sloppy maintainer that takes multiple months for an update, does not react to comments or ood flags, still uses a install script with broken paths (python 2.7), breaks the octoprint plugin system and the best part: it also installs into a venv! So if using a venv would be really the reason for deleting my package then 'octoprint' should be deleted immediately too. For other reasons I can only speculate, maybe you think using a -venv suffix (to make clear that it includes a virtualenv) was a bad decision? But then why not just gracefully merge/rename? I guess I am shouting into a void, same as my last mail nobody reads this anyway and you almighty TUs don't care if only broken crap is left on the AUR. Makes no sense to waste anymore of my time here. On 25.07.21 04:38, notify--- via aur-requests wrote:
Request #26744 has been accepted by yan12125 [1].