17 Aug
2014
17 Aug
'14
1:47 p.m.
On Sunday 17 August 2014 at 11:18:25, Martti Kühne wrote:
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 7:39 AM, carstene1ns <arch@carsten-teibes.de> wrote:
Package maintainer was a TU and he even re-uploaded the package now. Who is at fault here? FredBezies for requesting? foutrelis for deleting? keenerd for maintaining and re-uploading?
just to bring it up: ...or google for threading all "request accepted" and "request declined" emails. can't we use the same subject (thread-id?) as the respective request? that would provide a more sensible grouping in whatever email browser you're using...
cheers! mar77i
The In-Reply-To: header seems to be correctly set on automated emails. Apparently it's gmail web interface to blame. -- Ivan Shapovalov / intelfx /