Actually, yeah, that sounds much better: have both packages, v3 and v4. Need any help with the v4 packaging?

hk:v5sw4hw3pr6XMFck4edu6ln5/6ma4os6UedVcr4bo7ga4DBXCa32p/9+/8h7et6S

On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 4:41 AM, Muflone <webreg@vbsimple.net> wrote:
>FreeNX 4 is not the same of FreeNX 3 and cannot provide the same
>functionality, therefore until I find a valid reason to break
>compatibility with NX and with the wiki itself, I won't update FreeNX
>to v4.
>
>If you want I could submit a separated FreeNX v4 package.
A better approach would be to create a separated package for older FreeNX 3 and update the nx-all package to v4 (if it works).
--
Muflone