30 Aug
2018
30 Aug
'18
1:59 p.m.
On 8/30/18 9:56 AM, Benjamin Hodgetts wrote:
Not to mention that these are obvious duplicates, and you just systematically ignored the rules.
This wasn't a duplicate. One works, one doesn't. If they were duplicates then that wouldn't be the case.
Some of my old temporary packages were fine to be deleted though as the "originals" have since been fixed. But this was not one such case.
Allow me to clarify the rules. As a TU, I am telling you in an unambiguous manner, those are duplicates. "The other package is broken" is *NOT* a valid reason to upload a duplicate package. If you cannot accept that fact, then we may end up having a problem. -- Eli Schwartz Bug Wrangler and Trusted User