On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 7:22 AM, Robin Broda via aur-requests <aur-requests@archlinux.org> wrote:
On 06/05/2018 10:06 PM, John wrote:
The readme on github is pretty descriptive and well commented and as you pointed out below
That's irrelevant
the terminology I used is from upstream.
You *are* upstream in this case, so that's sort of a weak excuse
When I referenced "upstream" I did not mean myself, I meant lxc upstream. Refer to the lxc-copy man page, the -s switch is short of in their terminology "snapshot."
Quoting the AUR Rules of submission as taken from the wiki: 'Make sure the package you want to upload is useful. Will anyone else want to use this package? Is it extremely specialized?'. Does that answer your question?
I am aware of the rule and feel that this software is value-added. As I read it, the request was filed because someone doesn't like the name. That isn't a reason to drop something from the AUR.