Hi,

I saw the normal and -git tag pattern in other packages and followed that approach, but thanks for clarifying about the -bin suffix. 

I’ll add a proper description with the next update.

I’m just frustrated because it feels like matthewq337 spammed several packages with short, generic deletion requests and then never followed up on them.


_________________________________________________________
Da4ndo
Software Engineer — Backend & Full‑Stack Developer
Experienced in Rust, TypeScript, Python, C #, C ++ ,Go, Java
📄 Portfolio & Blog: https://da4ndo.com
📧 contact@da4ndo.com


a821 <a821@mail.de> ezt írta (időpont: 2025. aug. 3., V, 11:17):
On Sat, Aug 02, 2025 at 11:37:47PM +0200, Da4ndo wrote:
> Hi matthewq337,
>
> I just read your deletion request for hyde‑ext—and I’m furious. Frankly,
> taking a shot at an AUR package without bothering to fully understand what
> it is or how it works is irresponsible.
>
> You wrote:
>
> > “a PKGBUILD for someone’s personal dotfiles does not really meet the
> > usefulness criteria of the AUR”

[...]

It looks to me, by reading the description, that this installs a list of
"curated" (by whom?) packages and configurations, which for me it's very
personal, by definition. But maybe this is useful for others, I'm not
sure...

However, the PKGBUILD should build from source and not install a binary
from your repo. The description is missing, and it should declare
depends (I see that it requires an AUR helper [1] at least).

Some of your other packages have the same problem: they should build
from sources: project-cleaner, hyprproxlock, cengine.

[1] https://github.com/Da4ndo/Hyde-Ext/blob/main/src/install/packages.rs#L47