23 Nov
2018
23 Nov
'18
8 p.m.
It definitely would. I was in two minds about whether or not to create a package that is identical to kdiff3-kf5-git with the only difference being minor changes to build the latest sources. If that's what you recommend, I'll create kdiff3-git and mark this for deletion. On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 at 02:45, <notify@aur.archlinux.org> wrote:
Request #13063 has been accepted by eschwartz [1]:
sure, but wouldn't it make more sense to rename it to kdiff3-git?