Archey3 is on the wiki, not Archey4.
You have already mentioned Archey4 on the Archey3 AUR page, one year ago.
Not everyone wants to use Archey4, and forking by changing the number to make it seem like it has been superseded is not a good practice.
Furthermore, you want to steal the 171 votes and comments of archey3 with this merge request.
If the fork of archey4 was by the same author, we could have understood that, it is not the case here.
Archey4 has 16 votes, does not have a wiki page (yet).
It does seem too early to consider a deletion request for archey3-git in the AUR (Arch Linux User Repository).
AUR/archey3-git is not defunct and I am still maintaining it.
You know that archey - first of his name - decided to remove archey4 as a listed fork on GitHub.
And even, djmelik is planning a complete re-write of Archey.
It is very much too early to say 100% that the fork archey4 has to take the crown.
On 1 Aug 2023, at 17:26, notify@aur.archlinux.org wrote:
MarsSeed [1] filed a request to merge archey3-git [2] into archey4
[3]:
As discussed with maintainer @HLFH in comments 10+ months ago, this
application has been superseded by continuation fork archey4. He
posted a link to the new AUR package then, so users should be well-
informed at this point.
Archey3 has not been developed since 2018. [a]
Arch repo still carries the last archey3 (however, devs would be
advised to consider adopting archey4 to [extra]).
Though archey3-git is a VCS package and AUR/archey4 is not, there's no
VCS package for the latter but it would still be good to migrate the
high number of votes and comments to the successor application's
package rather than just deleting them.
AUR/archey3-git is defunct so there's no harm in removing that in
favor of archey4.
[a]: https://github.com/lclarkmichalek/archey3/commits/master
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/archey3-git/
[3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/archey4/