Hi Marcell
the pypy-lxml package was dropped and actually there're no reasons to free the pypy-lxml name
Muflone, I disagree on the last point.
There are some people, e.g. those who work in science and Academia, who might benefit from being able to use PyPy for Python2 from AUR. (Such packages could be added by @petronny to the Arch4Edu unofficial repo, who already maintains the pypy-bin package.)
By requesting pypy-lxml package deletion you won't solve any problem raised, this will only create a new problem, the lack of pypy3-lxml package. Whenever the pypy3-lxml package maintainer raises the wish to rename the pkgbase and to reupload it with the correct name, his request would be approved for sure.
Denying the ability on AUR to create a pypy-lxml for Python2 does not seem to be a good decision to me.
There're actually no requests to free this pkgbase, so the deletion is not only pointless but also a damage to the current situation. Regards -- Fabio Castelli aka Muflone