envolution [1] filed a deletion request for opencode [2]:
Maintainer is aware that including binary packages in a non-bin namespace is not correct, and continues committing updates here several times daily. This package has been merged and deleted based on this more than once:
https:/
/ lists. archlinux. org/ archives/ list/ aur-
requests@lists. archlinux. org/ message/ IDPYIMVZ2UHDINZNWLMFDC27IUYS5ZRZ/ https:/
/ lists. archlinux. org/ archives/ list/ aur-
requests@lists. archlinux. org/ message/ QQGT4YFLYRFFZN536CIVHMIPTJWZOHP7/ Maintainer has confirmed his intention of only submitting binary releases in: https:/
/ requests@lists. archlinux. org/ archives/ list/ aur- lists. archlinux. org/ message/ HTTWLJSRHPWHJNUEUAVKS2ULI5XR7ER6/ Maintainer has been informed that this package is a duplicate of aur/opencode-bin and suggested it was an error (1 month ago) https:/
/ aur. archlinux. org/ packages/ opencode-bin#comment-1030701 Maintainer was contacted letting him know his CI actions were recreating aur/opencode with binaries here:
https:// and here: https:/aur. archlinux. org/ packages/ opencode#comment-1033898 / github. com/ sst/ opencode/ issues/ 1358 His new reasoning is that it's to prevent namesquatters.
I am concerned that deleting this package will (again) only be a temporary measure - considering opencode-bin seems popular, and is generated by the project's github actions - maybe at least for now block the opencode namespace or free up both to allow others them as per the guidelines
[1] https:/
/ aur. archlinux. org/ account/ envolution/
[2] https:// aur. archlinux. org/ pkgbase/ opencode/