At this point it is more useful than sl which is also something called sometimes when users mistype a command. (And I would argue more useful than some scripts with "personal" in the description with pretty lacking descriptions that are in the AUR but tbf more of them turned up on the package search a few years ago so I guess you either actually go after them or they are vanishing for different reasons...)
Maybe not that much, but you can now choose to let you show a quiz question before the start of nano.
(Currently with lists for katakana and hiragana but I can easily expand it for lists for kanji within the following week)
I can expand it with different learning content as well.
Actually, since a few weeks after some longer break (see my GitHub contribution graph and codeberg profile) I'm working on getting older scripts I once wrote to get some of the functionality I once noted so that they are more useful in general. The recently submitted pdfgrep_sixel thing is such a case — the last real update I gave to the script behind that before working last week on it was four years ago. After the recent update I first submitted to the AUR since I determined it to be useful enough at that point. (Previously it had more problems depending on the TE, which is unfortunately the case due to different quality of sixel implementations.)
I have a terminal emulator open with tabs for such projects and I'm working on them one after another. (However this doesn't mean I intend to add them onto the AUR. The huge majority of things I create stay only on GitHub or Codeberg and I only add something new to the AUR every few years). The nani script (that has at least three stars on GitHub, had a vote in the AUR and iirc somebody copied it to their custom Arch repo but I didn't find it yesterday evening after a quick search) would have surely gotten an overhaul in a few weeks if it wasn't for the surprising deletion request by a pretty new account that did only upload one AUR package and made one deletion request so far. If the person had contacted me, I could have told them that. And if that person was interested in getting the name, there could also have been a friendly contact with a potential positive outcome for that.
Thanks for these friendly, motivating experiences... (This text was written before the other deletion requests that I find valid myself... just had to figure out how to be able to respond to this mailing list since this text didn't go through the first try.)