On 1/7/24 18:20, Fabio Loli wrote:
Request #52809 has been Accepted by Antiz [1]:
[Autogenerated] Accepted deletion for hqplayer.
Why deleting hqplayer? Typically we update the main pkgbuild to the new version and create other pkgbuilds for legacy versions
Also IMO naming of hqplayer pkgbuilds could be harmonized
There are at the moment names and versions are:
hqplayer-embedded 5.3.2 hqplayer-client 5.3.2 hqplayer5 5.3.2 hqplayer4 4.22.1 hqplayer-pro 4.22.2 hqplayer-network-audio-daemon 4.6.0 hqplayer-embedded-sse 5.3.2
Arch PAckagers opinion?
Note however that there isn't hqplayer-pro v5.x or embedded/client at v4.x
Hi,
I accepted the request as the PKGBUILD was stuck to v3 and did not seem to draw a lot of attention (no comment/few old votes).
However, I agree that naming of the PKGBUILDs should be harmonized with "hqplayer" pointing to the latest version.
FWIW, all "hqplayer" related packages seems to all be maintained by the same account.
I can "resurrect" the "hqplayer" package in favor of a merge request from "hqplayer5" to "hqplayer" instead. How does that sound?
Sounds good to me