31 Jan
2017
31 Jan
'17
9:23 a.m.
On 01/30/17 at 11:15pm, Kieran Colford wrote:
No one as expressed a valid reason for removal aside from an unclear purpose. I have corrected that now so it should be fine.
The package really serves no purpose just as the previous one. It will only cause confusion since pacaur calls bauerbill, which is reason enough for me to remove it. -- Jelle van der Waa