On Monday 18 August 2014 10:43:21 notify@aur.archlinux.org wrote:

jamesan [1] filed a request to merge xcursor-oxygen-neon [2] into xcursor-oxy-neon [3]:

Packages build the same target except this one references an opaque dropbox tarball and broken upstream URL.

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/jamesan/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/xcursor-oxygen-neon/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/xcursor-oxy-neon/

As far as I understand according to the page [1] the correct name is xcursor- oxygen-neon. But this package isn't updated since 2012 unlike xcursor-oxy-neon which is well maintained. I think we should merge xcursor-oxy-neo into xcursor-oxygen-neon and then we disown xcursor-oxygen-neon (now, since dynamo looks an inactive, or over disown request). I'm CCing this message to the xcursor-oxy-neon maintainer. 1. http://gnome-look.org/content/show.php/Oxygen+Neon?content=137109 -- С уважением, Е.Алексеев. Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev. e-mail: darkarcanis@mail.ru ICQ: 407-398-235 Jabber: arcanis@jabber.ru

Request #554 has been rejected by arcanis [1]: I merge xcursor-oxy-neon into xcursor-oxygen-neon since seems it is more correct name according to the project homepage [1]. For more details see discussion in the ML. Feel free to file an orphan request if the original package will be not updated (the maintainer says that he will do it). 1. http://gnome-look.org/content/show.php/Oxygen+Neon?content=137109 [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/arcanis/