[PRQ#62896] Deletion Request for gnuplot4
MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for gnuplot4 [2]: Dependency chain (of wxgtk2.8) is broken. The latest version of this utility software is available in Arch/extra repo, and provides more features, not less. Also AUR has GUI-less variants, for interactive CLI usage (AUR/gnuplot-nogui) as well as headless (scripted) usage (AUR/gnuplot- headless). [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/gnuplot4/
Dear MarsSeed, as the current maintainer of the gnuplot4 package, I would like to thank you for bringing these issues to my attention. I will try to address each point, reporting the excerpts from your email in bold: */> Dependency chain (of wxgtk2.8) is broken. /*Could you please elaborate more on what you mean with "broken"? I just tried to compile the wxgtk2.8 package and I was able to build a package in a clean chroot. If you encountered a build issue, I invite you to report it in the comments section for the wxgtk2.8 package, and I will try to address it as soon as possible. */> The latest version of this utility software is available in Arch/extra
repo, and provides more features, not less./*
Unfortunately, the latest version of gnuplot (v6.0.1) is not fully backward compatible with gnuplot v4 (among other changes, the default colors differ). Having an AUR package for a legacy version of a software can be crucial for reproducing old plots. Additionally (and please do correct me if I'm wrong, I'm not an expert), the sole fact that a package is outdated does not imply that it should not be available in AUR. Consider for example the "gcc43" package. The latest GCC version is indeed available in the official repositories, and they offer more features, but there is still value in providing the legacy version. *> Also AUR has GUI-less variants, for interactive CLI usage
(AUR/gnuplot-nogui) as well as headless (scripted) usage (AUR/gnuplot- headless).*
Unfortunately, as far as I know, none of the mentioned packages provides a fully backward-compatible way of re-generating old plots. I thank you again for raising the above points, and I completely understand the need to balance the maintenance burden between new and old software. If the final decision of the AUR maintainers is to delete the package, I will surely comply. The only reason I submitted the package is because I hoped others could share my work and take advantage of it. With my best regards, Francesco ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* notify@aur.archlinux.org *Subject:* [PRQ#62896] Deletion Request for gnuplot4 *Date:* Wednesday, August 28, 2024 at 13:41 UTC+2 *To:* aur-requests@lists.archlinux.org *Cc:* frazar0@hotmail.it, marcell.meszaros@runbox.eu
MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for gnuplot4 [2]:
Dependency chain (of wxgtk2.8) is broken. The latest version of this utility software is available in Arch/extra repo, and provides more features, not less.
Also AUR has GUI-less variants, for interactive CLI usage (AUR/gnuplot-nogui) as well as headless (scripted) usage (AUR/gnuplot- headless).
[1]https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/gnuplot4/
Request #62896 has been Rejected by MarsSeed [1]: Thank you, Francesco / @frazar0 for your detailed response and explanation of the rationale behind this legacy package. I am canceling this deletion request, please kindly disregard it. It was based on mistaken assumptions on my part. Cheers! Marcell / @MarsSeed [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/
participants (2)
-
frazar0@hotmail.it
-
notify@aur.archlinux.org