[aur-requests] [PRQ#18231] Deletion Request for ttf-iosevka-termlig-custom-git
andykluger [1] filed a deletion request for ttf-iosevka-termlig- custom-git [2]: Upstream is changing the style names, so formerly "termlig" is now "term" and I'd like to replace this package with a properly named new one. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/andykluger/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/ttf-iosevka-termlig-custom-git/
Please post the new one first then request this be merged into it. Combined with proper provides/conflicts/replaces that leaves anybody using the package an upgrade path instead of stranding them. On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 12:42 AM notify--- via aur-requests < aur-requests@archlinux.org> wrote:
andykluger [1] filed a deletion request for ttf-iosevka-termlig- custom-git [2]:
Upstream is changing the style names, so formerly "termlig" is now "term" and I'd like to replace this package with a properly named new one.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/andykluger/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/ttf-iosevka-termlig-custom-git/
On 2020-03-05 22:41, notify--- via aur-requests wrote:
andykluger [1] filed a deletion request for ttf-iosevka-termlig- custom-git [2]:
Upstream is changing the style names, so formerly "termlig" is now "term" and I'd like to replace this package with a properly named new one.
I don't understand this deletion request as the package "ttf-iosevka-term-custom-git" has already existed since 2017. What is the new package name you want to use, or did you mean to file a merge request of "ttf-iosevka-termlig- custom-git" into "ttf-iosevka-term-custom-git" instead? Cheers, Jonas
Request #18231 has been rejected by diabonas [1]: I don't understand this request, and requests for further explanation (https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur- requests/2020-March/038273.html, https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur- requests/2020-March/038352.html) have gone unanswered. If you still want this package to be renamed, please create the new package first, then file a merge request with a more detailed explanation. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/diabonas/
Sorry, I had requested three different iosevka package deletions, and didn't notice that only 2/3 were accepted. I'm not very good at email. The termlig package is no longer valid, and its successor already exists. If you think a merge request is better, sure, I'll file one shortly. On Thu, Mar 19, 2020, 5:07 AM <notify@aur.archlinux.org> wrote:
Request #18231 has been rejected by diabonas [1]:
I don't understand this request, and requests for further explanation (https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur- requests/2020-March/038273.html, https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur- requests/2020-March/038352.html) have gone unanswered. If you still want this package to be renamed, please create the new package first, then file a merge request with a more detailed explanation.
participants (4)
-
Andy Kluger
-
Caleb Maclennan
-
Jonas Witschel
-
notify＠aur.archlinux.org