[aur-requests] [PRQ#13786] Orphan Request for kicad-git
GPereira [1] filed a orphan request for kicad-git [2]: Only when I filled the request :| Maintainer was quick to upload the change that I was requesting when he felt threatned to orphan the package... I think this is a bad way of doing things so I would like to ask you if you could orphan the package nonetheless. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/GPereira/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/kicad-git/
On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 19:32:28 +0000 (UTC) notify--- via aur-requests <aur-requests@archlinux.org> wrote:
GPereira [1] filed a orphan request for kicad-git [2]:
Only when I filled the request :|
Maintainer was quick to upload the change that I was requesting when he felt threatned to orphan the package...
I think this is a bad way of doing things so I would like to ask you if you could orphan the package nonetheless.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/GPereira/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/kicad-git/
You gave them less than one day and badgered them constantly. Your behavior on the package page is ridiculous and this should be dismissed without any further consideration.
I don't think the response I received from the mantainer was productive that's it. On 12/01/19 20:46, Doug Newgard wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 19:32:28 +0000 (UTC) notify--- via aur-requests <aur-requests@archlinux.org> wrote:
GPereira [1] filed a orphan request for kicad-git [2]:
Only when I filled the request :|
Maintainer was quick to upload the change that I was requesting when he felt threatned to orphan the package...
I think this is a bad way of doing things so I would like to ask you if you could orphan the package nonetheless.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/GPereira/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/kicad-git/ You gave them less than one day and badgered them constantly. Your behavior on the package page is ridiculous and this should be dismissed without any further consideration.
On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 07:48:30PM +0000, Gonçalo Pereira wrote:
I don't think the response I received from the mantainer was productive that's it.
Resubmitting an Orphan request in spite is also not productive. This isn't the first time you have done this, and you have been warned in the past[1]. So give me one good reason for not suspending your account right now. [1]: https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-requests/2018-February/022348.html -- Morten Linderud PGP: 9C02FF419FECBE16
On 1/12/19 2:56 PM, Morten Linderud via aur-requests wrote:
On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 07:48:30PM +0000, Gonçalo Pereira wrote:
I don't think the response I received from the mantainer was productive that's it.
Resubmitting an Orphan request in spite is also not productive.
This isn't the first time you have done this, and you have been warned in the past[1]. So give me one good reason for not suspending your account right now.
[1]: https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-requests/2018-February/022348.html
Correction, he's been suspended for it before: https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-requests/2018-March/023217.html I'm 100% positive it is now time to permanently evict him from our community. -- Eli Schwartz Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
On 1/12/19 6:44 PM, Eli Schwartz wrote:
On 1/12/19 2:56 PM, Morten Linderud via aur-requests wrote:
On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 07:48:30PM +0000, Gonçalo Pereira wrote:
I don't think the response I received from the mantainer was productive that's it.
Resubmitting an Orphan request in spite is also not productive.
This isn't the first time you have done this, and you have been warned in the past[1]. So give me one good reason for not suspending your account right now.
[1]: https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-requests/2018-February/022348.html
Correction, he's been suspended for it before:
https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-requests/2018-March/023217.html
I'm 100% positive it is now time to permanently evict him from our community.
Words are bloat and phrasing sucks. :p The community I am discussing is specifically in the context of AUR users, packagers and maintainers. -- Eli Schwartz Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
Request #13786 has been rejected by Foxboron [1]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Foxboron/
participants (5)
-
Doug Newgard
-
Eli Schwartz
-
Gonçalo Pereira
-
Morten Linderud
-
notify＠aur.archlinux.org