jdarch [1] filed a request to merge softmaker-office-bin [2] into softmaker-office-2012-bin [3]: For users who want to stay at their version, or wish to install multiple versions, it is more convenient to be able to use packages with names dependent on their version. Therefore I would suggest merging softmaker-office-bin into softmaker-office-2012-bin, and future versions (e.g. 2016, 2020... wherever it may end) bear their main version number in the package name. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/jdarch/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/softmaker-office-bin/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/softmaker-office-2012-bin/