[aur-requests] [PRQ#3723] Deletion Request for gg
karol_007 [1] filed a deletion request for gg [2]: The PKGBUILD is longer that the script it packages $ wc -c PKGBUILD gg 428 PKGBUILD 255 gg https://aur4.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/plain/PKGBUILD?h=gg https://raw.githubusercontent.com/qguv/gg/master/gg #!/bin/sh case $* in "--help") echo "'gg' restarts the system. Use 'gg no re' to halt the system instead.";; "") sudo systemctl reboot;; "nore"|"no re") sudo systemctl poweroff;; *) echo "yeah $* gg";; esac [1] https://aur4.archlinux.org/account/karol_007/ [2] https://aur4.archlinux.org/pkgbase/gg/
Karol, On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 3:23 PM, <notify@aur.archlinux.org> wrote:
karol_007 [1] filed a deletion request for gg [2]: The PKGBUILD is longer that the script it packages
Great. Why is this a problem? I put it `gg` on the AUR to make sure I was familiar with the new aur4 process. I find `gg` useful, and I hope other Arch users will too. $ wc -c PKGBUILD gg msg.txt 428 PKGBUILD 255 gg 607 msg.txt Scott Adams said: "Engineers like to solve problems. If there are no problems handily available, they will create their own problems." Cheers, Quint
On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 15:33:11 -0400 Quint Guvernator <quint@guvernator.net> wrote:
Karol,
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 3:23 PM, <notify@aur.archlinux.org> wrote:
karol_007 [1] filed a deletion request for gg [2]: The PKGBUILD is longer that the script it packages
Great. Why is this a problem?
I put it `gg` on the AUR to make sure I was familiar with the new aur4 process. I find `gg` useful, and I hope other Arch users will too.
$ wc -c PKGBUILD gg msg.txt 428 PKGBUILD 255 gg 607 msg.txt
Scott Adams said: "Engineers like to solve problems. If there are no problems handily available, they will create their own problems."
Cheers, Quint
As a script, this makes little sense. All you're really doing is shortening a single command, which is much better done with an alias. You shouldn't even need the 'sudo' if this is local. I agree that it really shouldn't be in the AUR.
On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 15:33:11 -0400 Quint Guvernator <quint@guvernator.net> wrote:
Karol,
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 3:23 PM, <notify@aur.archlinux.org> wrote:
karol_007 [1] filed a deletion request for gg [2]: The PKGBUILD is longer that the script it packages Great. Why is this a problem?
I put it `gg` on the AUR to make sure I was familiar with the new aur4 process. I find `gg` useful, and I hope other Arch users will too.
$ wc -c PKGBUILD gg msg.txt 428 PKGBUILD 255 gg 607 msg.txt
Scott Adams said: "Engineers like to solve problems. If there are no problems handily available, they will create their own problems."
Cheers, Quint As a script, this makes little sense. All you're really doing is shortening a single command, which is much better done with an alias. You shouldn't even need the 'sudo' if this is local.
I agree that it really shouldn't be in the AUR. I agree, that it is a bad script, should not contain sudo and could be solved otherwise. What I don't agree with is this totally random way of deciding what's supposed to be okay and what not. I cannot find rules about what's okay. The same type of behavior lead to the removal of
Am 11.07.2015 um 14:36 schrieb Doug Newgard: ddate from util-linux, because of the possible implications for some people with an arbitrary set of "traditional moral values"[1]. Instead of simply removing it from the AUR, we should file a bug report to solve the sudo problem (polkit integration perhaps?), this should also generate enough code to solve the "PKGBUILD longer than script" problem, a problem that might also happen with very dense Perl regex. Maybe adding the license text to the script might satisfy the wc -l in-depth analysis. [1]https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=149321
On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 14:24:37 +0200 Sascha Shaw <sascha.shaw@mail.de> wrote:
I agree, that it is a bad script, should not contain sudo and could be solved otherwise. What I don't agree with is this totally random way of deciding what's supposed to be okay and what not. I cannot find rules about what's okay.
The threshold for inclusion in the AUR is, as it has been for a long time, that the package should be useful to others. In this case, installing what boils down to 'alias gg="systemctl reboot"' with one optional argument isn't something anyone else is going to use.
Request #3723 has been accepted by Muflone [1]. [1] https://aur4.archlinux.org/account/Muflone/
participants (4)
-
Doug Newgard
-
notify＠aur.archlinux.org
-
Quint Guvernator
-
Sascha Shaw