jnbek [1] filed a request to merge visualstudiocode [2] into visual-studio-code [3]:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/visual-studio-code/ was first.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/jnbek/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/visualstudiocode/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/visual-studio-code/
On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 19:40:28 +0000 (UTC) notify@aur.archlinux.org wrote:
jnbek [1] filed a request to merge visualstudiocode [2] into visual-studio-code [3]:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/visual-studio-code/ was first.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/jnbek/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/visualstudiocode/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/visual-studio-code/
You seem to be mistaken. visualstudiocode was first by 5 minutes.
On 29/04, Doug Newgard wrote:
You seem to be mistaken. visualstudiocode was first by 5 minutes.
Better question is which name is better. I would personally prefer visual-studio-code over visualstudiocode, but that’s subjective of course.
Request #3171 has been accepted by Kyrias [1].
aur-requests@lists.archlinux.org