[aur-requests] [PRQ#2433] Merge Request for grass
czk [1] filed a request to merge grass [2] into grass64 [3]: I have just inherited an outdated "grass" and want to have it merged into my "grass64". The 2 are esentially the same software, only the "grass64" package is up-to-date and better maintained. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/czk/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/grass/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/grass64/
On Thursday, February 19, 2015 18:38:34 notify@aur.archlinux.org wrote:
czk [1] filed a request to merge grass [2] into grass64 [3]:
I have just inherited an outdated "grass" and want to have it merged into my "grass64". The 2 are esentially the same software, only the "grass64" package is up-to-date and better maintained.
Actually I don't feel the need. Why not leave it as is for now and just update the grass package to GRASS 7.0 when it get released? Regards, Felix Yan
W dniu 20.02.2015 o 08:23, Felix Yan pisze:
On Thursday, February 19, 2015 18:38:34 notify@aur.archlinux.org wrote:
czk [1] filed a request to merge grass [2] into grass64 [3]:
I have just inherited an outdated "grass" and want to have it merged into my "grass64". The 2 are esentially the same software, only the "grass64" package is up-to-date and better maintained.
Actually I don't feel the need. Why not leave it as is for now and just update the grass package to GRASS 7.0 when it get released?
grass is a qgis-1.6 and gstat dependency. Can QGIS depend on GRASS 7? Last time (few months ago) I checked it could not. And what about gstat? Maciek -- Maciej Sieczka http://www.sieczka.org
On Friday, February 20, 2015 18:34:44 Maciej Sieczka wrote:
W dniu 20.02.2015 o 08:23, Felix Yan pisze:
On Thursday, February 19, 2015 18:38:34 notify@aur.archlinux.org wrote:
czk [1] filed a request to merge grass [2] into grass64 [3]:
I have just inherited an outdated "grass" and want to have it merged into my "grass64". The 2 are esentially the same software, only the "grass64" package is up-to-date and better maintained.
Actually I don't feel the need. Why not leave it as is for now and just update the grass package to GRASS 7.0 when it get released?
grass is a qgis-1.6 and gstat dependency. Can QGIS depend on GRASS 7? Last time (few months ago) I checked it could not. And what about gstat?
The merge won't help for this, they still have to update their dependencies after the merge. Regards, Felix Yan
W dniu 21.02.2015 o 05:42, Felix Yan pisze:
On Friday, February 20, 2015 18:34:44 Maciej Sieczka wrote:
W dniu 20.02.2015 o 08:23, Felix Yan pisze:
On Thursday, February 19, 2015 18:38:34 notify@aur.archlinux.org wrote:
czk [1] filed a request to merge grass [2] into grass64 [3]:
I have just inherited an outdated "grass" and want to have it merged into my "grass64". The 2 are esentially the same software, only the "grass64" package is up-to-date and better maintained.
Actually I don't feel the need. Why not leave it as is for now and just update the grass package to GRASS 7.0 when it get released?
grass is a qgis-1.6 and gstat dependency. Can QGIS depend on GRASS 7? Last time (few months ago) I checked it could not. And what about gstat?
The merge won't help for this, they still have to update their dependencies after the merge.
I still want to merge grass into grass64, then release GRASS 7.0 as "grass". Who is to decide whether to merge or not? Maciek -- Maciej Sieczka http://www.sieczka.org
Request #2433 has been accepted by Muflone [1]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Muflone/
W dniu 02.03.2015 o 11:10, notify@aur.archlinux.org pisze:
Request #2433 has been accepted by Muflone [1].
Much appreciated, Fabio! Thank you very much. Maciek -- Maciej Sieczka http://www.sieczka.org
participants (3)
-
Felix Yan
-
Maciej Sieczka
-
notify＠aur.archlinux.org