[aur-requests] [PRQ#5230] Deletion Request for gtk-theme-iris-dark-git - Aur-requests - lists.archlinux.org

newer
[aur-requests] [PRQ#5229] Deletion...

[aur-requests] [PRQ#5230] Deletion Request for gtk-theme-iris-dark-git

older
[aur-requests] [PRQ#5231] Deletion...

notify＠aur.archlinux.org

19 Apr 2016 19 Apr '16

6:42 a.m.

soundtoxin [1] filed a deletion request for gtk-theme-iris-dark-git [2]: This needs to be updated. There's a lot of visual breakage that makes it hard to use pavucontrol and firefox. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/soundtoxin/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/gtk-theme-iris-dark-git/

Show replies by date

Gordian Edenhofer

19 Apr 19 Apr

3:48 p.m.

On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 06:42 +0000, notify@aur.archlinux.org wrote:

soundtoxin [1] filed a deletion request for gtk-theme-iris-dark-git [2]:

This needs to be updated. There's a lot of visual breakage that makes it hard to use pavucontrol and firefox.

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/soundtoxin/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/gtk-theme-iris-dark-git/

The PKGBUILD itself is up-to-date and there are no changes necessary for the package to build properly. The problem described by soundtoxin occur due to the theme lacking GTK+ 3.20 support. There was not much time for a developer to update the theme and I am optimistic, that GTK+ 3.20 support will be added at some point in the future. @TU Apparently the user soundtoxin filed this deletion request by accident, see the package's comments section. Best Regards Gordian

Doug Newgard

4:03 p.m.

On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 17:48:20 +0200 Gordian Edenhofer wrote:

There was not much time for a developer to update the theme ...

I'm curious, how much time is reasonable here? These changes have been known for about 6 months now. https://blogs.gnome.org/mclasen/2015/11/20/a-gtk-update/

Gordian Edenhofer

4:38 p.m.

On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 11:03 -0500, Doug Newgard wrote:

On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 17:48:20 +0200 Gordian Edenhofer wrote:

...
There was not much time for a developer to update the theme ...

I'm curious, how much time is reasonable here? These changes have been known for about 6 months now.

https://blogs.gnome.org/mclasen/2015/11/20/a-gtk-update/

I would actually not expect many GTK+ theme designers to read any gnome developer blogs. Despite being informed about the changes, I guess most of them realized the difference as they got GNOME 3.20 on their machine. When referring to 'not much time' I was talking about the time since the GNOME 3.20 release about a month ago. Furthermore since only one guy developed the theme and maintains it [1], I think it would be rushed to remove the theme right now. [1] https://github.com/xyl0n/iris/graphs/contributors

notify＠aur.archlinux.org

25 Apr 25 Apr

9:19 p.m.

New subject: [aur-requests] [PRQ#5230] Request Rejected

Request #5230 has been rejected by Muflone [1]: Not a reason to delete the package [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Muflone/

2932

Age (days ago)

2938

Last active (days ago)

Download

4 comments

3 participants

tags

participants (3)

Doug Newgard
Gordian Edenhofer
notify＠aur.archlinux.org