[PRQ#65852] Deletion Request for ansible-core-2.16
MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for ansible-core-2.16 [2]: Older duplicate of Arch/extra/ansible-core. [a][b] [a]: https://archlinux.org/packages/?q=ansible-core [b]: https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/ansible- core/-/commits/main [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/ansible-core-2.16/
Please do not remove this. This is not a simple duplicate. ansible v2.17 removed python 3.6 as a supported remote version.[a] And many remote servers running an enterprise linux distribution, such as, RHEL 8 [b], SLES 15 [c], are still using python 3.6 as system-wide default python interpreter. Sysadmins using archlinux on their PCs needs ansible 2.16 to manage their servers. [a] https://github.com/ansible/ansible/blob/v2.17.0/changelogs/CHANGELOG-v2.17.r... [b] https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2018/11/14/python-in-rhel-8-3 [c] https://documentation.suse.com/sles/15-SP6/html/SLES-all/cha-upgrade-finish....
On 17 November 2024 10:10:28 GMT+01:00, nicolasyang <nicolasyang243@proton.me> wrote:
Please do not remove this.
This is not a simple duplicate. ansible v2.17 removed python 3.6 as a supported remote version.[a] And many remote servers running an enterprise linux distribution, such as, RHEL 8 [b], SLES 15 [c], are still using python 3.6 as system-wide default python interpreter. Sysadmins using archlinux on their PCs needs ansible 2.16 to manage their servers.
[a] https://github.com/ansible/ansible/blob/v2.17.0/changelogs/CHANGELOG-v2.17.r... [b] https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2018/11/14/python-in-rhel-8-3 [c] https://documentation.suse.com/sles/15-SP6/html/SLES-all/cha-upgrade-finish....
Hi @nicolasyang, Thank you for reply. I will cancel my deletion request shortly. To avoid future confusion, would you be so kind as to add a short remark in the package's pkgdesc about this? E.g. by appending "(legacy version for Python 3.6 remote support)", or something to this effect? Thank you in advance! Cheers, Marcell / MarsSeed
To avoid future confusion, would you be so kind as to add a short remark in the package's pkgdesc about this?
E.g. by appending "(legacy version for Python 3.6 remote support)", or something to this effect?
Hi MarsSeed, Thank you for you advice. I updated the package description. Sincerely, Nicholas Yang
Request #65852 has been Rejected by MarsSeed [1]: Canceling this request as per feedback by maintainer @nicolasyang. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/
participants (3)
-
Marcell Meszaros
-
nicolasyang
-
notify＠aur.archlinux.org