On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 04:18:28PM +1200, Charles Wise wrote:
On 2021-09-16 16:07, notify@aur.archlinux.org wrote:
Request #28192 has been rejected by alex19EP [1]:
should be the other way around. this package is binary and this is reflected in its name.
Historically, Eclipse packages have never included a "-bin" prefix despite being binary re-distribution - even when Eclipse was in the [community] repository, it did not have a "-bin" prefix even though it was not compiled.
sorry i didn't know about that.
With this in mind, I would like to request an exemption to the "-bin" naming based on the historical precedent of how Eclipse packages have been named both officially and unofficially. If approved, I'll re-submit a request to merge with eclipse-java [1].
looks logical to me. I will accept such requests next time. sorry for the inconvenience.
Regards, Charles
-- Sincerely, Alexander | Trusted User
aur-requests@lists.archlinux.org