[PRQ#58898] Deletion Request for wayfire-hidpi-xprop-git
tyress [1] filed a deletion request for wayfire-hidpi-xprop-git [2]: This package asks to be a requirement for a lot of packages, a total of 150. It is in fact not needed by most of them, and introduces a conflict as it is required by wayfire (when it seems to be an alternate repo). Quick search shows questionable git commits from users with no visibility as well, but this isn't conclusive on my part. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/tyress/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wayfire-hidpi-xprop-git/
Request #58898 has been Rejected by tyress [1]: I'll need to reconfirm this report, it seems like this is an old package that is being maintained. Just strange behavior [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/tyress/
This package bundles its own versions of wlroots (0.17.2 as of this writing) and wf-config (matching the wayfire-git package). Technically, package manager should be preferring in-repo packages over this, especially if they're already installed. I don't know what's up to cause paru to prefer this, other than the version numbers listed in the PKGBUILD. On Sun, Apr 7, 2024 at 7:20 AM <notify@aur.archlinux.org> wrote:
Request #58898 has been Rejected by tyress [1]:
I'll need to reconfirm this report, it seems like this is an old package that is being maintained. Just strange behavior
Okay, I’ve unbundled wlroots, for now. At least as long as wayfire-git is tracking 0.17.2 directly. I also moved all submodules into their own sources.
On Apr 7, 2024, at 4:44 PM, Christopher Snowhill <kode54@gmail.com> wrote:
This package bundles its own versions of wlroots (0.17.2 as of this writing) and wf-config (matching the wayfire-git package). Technically, package manager should be preferring in-repo packages over this, especially if they're already installed. I don't know what's up to cause paru to prefer this, other than the version numbers listed in the PKGBUILD.
On Sun, Apr 7, 2024 at 7:20 AM <notify@aur.archlinux.org> wrote:
Request #58898 has been Rejected by tyress [1]:
I'll need to reconfirm this report, it seems like this is an old package that is being maintained. Just strange behavior
participants (3)
-
Christopher Snowhill
-
Christopher Snowhill (kode54)
-
notify＠aur.archlinux.org