On Saturday, 26 October 2019 18:56:10 EEST Bruno Pagani wrote:

Le 26/10/2019 à 17:05, notify--- via aur-requests a écrit :

...

nl6720 [1] filed a deletion request for opensmtpd-libressl [2]:

opensmtpd 6.4.2p1-1 in the community repo is built against LibreSSL.

This might not be the case for the next release, which is going to be packaged very soon. However I’m not sure if there is an interest for both a LibreSSL and OpenSSL variant.

Regards, Bruno/Archange

Are you sure that would be wise? The OpenSMTPD 6.6.0 release notes say that they don't really test OpenSMTPD with OpenSSL. And it also lacks some features when built against OpenSSL.

Le 26/10/2019 à 18:26, Maarten de Vries a écrit :

On Sat, 26 Oct 2019 at 18:06, nl6720 mailto:nl6720@gmail.com> wrote:

On Saturday, 26 October 2019 18:56:10 EEST Bruno Pagani wrote: > Le 26/10/2019 à 17:05, notify--- via aur-requests a écrit : > > nl6720 [1] filed a deletion request for opensmtpd-libressl [2]: > > > > opensmtpd 6.4.2p1-1 in the community repo is built against LibreSSL. > > This might not be the case for the next release, which is going to be > packaged very soon. However I’m not sure if there is an interest for > both a LibreSSL and OpenSSL variant. > > Regards, > Bruno/Archange

Are you sure that would be wise? The OpenSMTPD 6.6.0 release notes say that they don't really test OpenSMTPD with OpenSSL. And it also lacks some features when built against OpenSSL.

I'm fine with deleting the package either way. I only uploaded it initially to get a recent version of openstmd. If it's not deleted I will probably orphan it.

I would personally stick with libressl for openstmd, for the same reason nl6720 mentions.

-- Maarten

Thanks both of you for your input, also upstream still recommends LibreSSL and intends to move to libtls only at some point, so yes, keeping LibreSSL seems the way to go. Regards, Bruno