On 24-02-2017 13:23, Bruno Pagani wrote:

Le 24/02/2017 à 13:20, Mauro Santos via aur-requests a écrit :

...

On 24-02-2017 04:22, notify@aur.archlinux.org wrote:

...

Eschwartz [1] filed a deletion request for hunspell-en-gb [2]:

obsolete now that [extra]/hunspell-en is a split package.

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Eschwartz/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/hunspell-en-gb/

I have created this package and hunspell-en-us[1] because originally the enhancement requests[2-3] to split hunspell-en where not accepted.

Given that now it is a split package I have no objections to having this and hunspell-en-us deleted from the AUR.

Please cc me if you reply because I'm not subscribed to aur-requests.

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/hunspell-en-us/ [2] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/24947 [3] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/30504

It was accepted at https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/50471.

I’ve opened a follow-up ticket for hunspell-fr at https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/53075. Should hyphen-{en,fr} and mythes-{en,fr} follow?

It would make sense to have them split also, for consistency and because of the same reason hunspell-en was split. If the split of hyphen-en and mythes-en is made then two other packages[1-2] could be deleted from the AUR. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hyphen-en-us/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mythes-en-us/

Deleting the package from the AUR.

Regards, Bruno

-- Mauro Santos