[PRQ#79580] Deletion Request for koca
TrialnError [1] filed a deletion request for koca [2]: I don't like to create deletion requests against "maintained" packages. But there was no response since I questioned the purpose of this in 2025-10-04. An empty PKGBUILD which has the role of a placeholder? But it doesn't serve any purpose in it's current form and therefore doesn't belong on the aurweb. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/TrialnError/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/koca/
Terribly sorry for the delay on this, life has been very very busy and my inbox has been quite cluttered... I do plan to use this in the near future. I actually have an Arch Linux build for the package in question - I'll get it published in the next few days. From: <notify@aur.archlinux.org> To: <aur-requests@lists.archlinux.org> Cc: <autumn-wind@web.de>, <hunter@hunterwittenborn.com> Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2026 14:11:35 -0600 Subject: [PRQ#79580] Deletion Request for koca TrialnError [1] filed a deletion request for koca [2]: I don't like to create deletion requests against "maintained" packages. But there was no response since I questioned the purpose of this in 2025-10-04. An empty PKGBUILD which has the role of a placeholder? But it doesn't serve any purpose in it's current form and therefore doesn't belong on the aurweb. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/TrialnError/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/koca/
Terribly sorry for the delay on this, life has been very very busy and my inbox has been quite cluttered... I do plan to use this in the near future. I actually have an Arch Linux build for the package in question - I'll get it published in the next few days. From: <notify@aur.archlinux.org> To: <aur-requests@lists.archlinux.org> Cc: <autumn-wind@web.de>, <hunter@hunterwittenborn.com> Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2026 14:11:35 -0600 Subject: [PRQ#79580] Deletion Request for koca TrialnError [1] filed a deletion request for koca [2]: I don't like to create deletion requests against "maintained" packages. But there was no response since I questioned the purpose of this in 2025-10-04. An empty PKGBUILD which has the role of a placeholder? But it doesn't serve any purpose in it's current form and therefore doesn't belong on the aurweb. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/TrialnError/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/koca/
Am 01.02.26 um 21:17 schrieb Hunter Wittenborn:
Terribly sorry for the delay on this, life has been very very busy and my inbox has been quite cluttered...
I do plan to use this in the near future. I actually have an Arch Linux build for the package in question - I'll get it published in the next few days.
Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2026 14:11:35 -0600 Subject: [PRQ#79580] Deletion Request for koca
TrialnError [1] filed a deletion request for koca [2]:
I don't like to create deletion requests against "maintained" packages. But there was no response since I questioned the purpose of this in 2025-10-04. An empty PKGBUILD which has the role of a placeholder? But it doesn't serve any purpose in it's current form and therefore doesn't belong on the aurweb.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/TrialnError/ <https:// aur.archlinux.org/account/TrialnError/> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/koca/ <https:// aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/koca/>
Alright. Good to read it isn't forgotten. Unfortunate I created this request. Best regards
Request #79580 has been Accepted by Muflone [1]: hwittenborn never ever publish empty packages, this is entirely prohibited, plus you're preventing other people to package it properly [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Muflone/
participants (3)
-
Hunter Wittenborn
-
Lex Black
-
notify@aur.archlinux.org