[PRQ#52300] Deletion Request for airgeddon-git
BoBeR182 [1] filed a deletion request for airgeddon-git [2]: As maintainer of this package (airgeddon-git), we were aligned with the "airgeddon" package maintainer. Now we co-maintain it. We decided to leave "airgeddon" package instead of this one. Not needed and it duplicates maintenance effort. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/BoBeR182/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/airgeddon-git/
BoBeR182 [1] filed a deletion request for airgeddon-git [2]:
As maintainer of this package (airgeddon-git), we were aligned with the "airgeddon" package maintainer. Now we co-maintain it. We decided to leave "airgeddon" package instead of this one. Not needed and it duplicates maintenance effort.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/BoBeR182/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/airgeddon-git/
A deletion request is already pending, please don't submit duplicate requests
I think it is fine for package owner to submit their request. Maintainers' own requests show up as filter for PM's, and these get priority treatment. Otherwise there's a 4+ month long queue as of now to get the request processed. Also, typically there are additional PM's who get involved in addressing maintainers' requests. I guess it's a more straightforward type of submission and therefore it's a bit less mentally burdensome, so it's easier for them to take up even when they are busy with other matters. On 19 December 2023 21:41:38 GMT+01:00, Fabio Loli <fabio.loli@disroot.org> wrote:
BoBeR182 [1] filed a deletion request for airgeddon-git [2]:
As maintainer of this package (airgeddon-git), we were aligned with the "airgeddon" package maintainer. Now we co-maintain it. We decided to leave "airgeddon" package instead of this one. Not needed and it duplicates maintenance effort.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/BoBeR182/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/airgeddon-git/
A deletion request is already pending, please don't submit duplicate requests
Sorry, my mistake. I see now that indeed this is a superfluous, duplicate request. On 19 December 2023 23:39:25 GMT+01:00, Marcell Meszaros <marcell.meszaros@runbox.eu> wrote:
I think it is fine for package owner to submit their request.
Maintainers' own requests show up as filter for PM's, and these get priority treatment.
Otherwise there's a 4+ month long queue as of now to get the request processed.
Also, typically there are additional PM's who get involved in addressing maintainers' requests. I guess it's a more straightforward type of submission and therefore it's a bit less mentally burdensome, so it's easier for them to take up even when they are busy with other matters.
On 19 December 2023 21:41:38 GMT+01:00, Fabio Loli <fabio.loli@disroot.org> wrote:
BoBeR182 [1] filed a deletion request for airgeddon-git [2]:
As maintainer of this package (airgeddon-git), we were aligned with the "airgeddon" package maintainer. Now we co-maintain it. We decided to leave "airgeddon" package instead of this one. Not needed and it duplicates maintenance effort.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/BoBeR182/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/airgeddon-git/
A deletion request is already pending, please don't submit duplicate requests
Request #52300 has been Accepted by muflone [1]: [Autogenerated] Accepted deletion for airgeddon-git. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/muflone/
participants (3)
-
Fabio Loli
-
Marcell Meszaros
-
notify＠aur.archlinux.org