I would pretty much like to get rid of one of the packages. But as for the naming I'd like to adopt the naming scheme of the official packages (e. g. https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/jdk7-openjdk/) and keep java7-oracle package (and the derived packages). On 07.09.2014 23:26, notify@aur.archlinux.org wrote:

Jristz [1] filed a request to merge java7-oracle [2] into jdk7 [3]:

As following the long runing name scheme of jdk, jdk-devel, jre, jre-devel jdk7-docs and so I think that jdk7-oracle need to merge into jdk7. There will be no big fuss since the packages are from the same maintainer so this will aliviate they work too.

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Jristz/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/java7-oracle/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/jdk7/

On dim, 2014-09-07 at 23:33 +0200, Jochen Schalanda wrote:

I would pretty much like to get rid of one of the packages. But as for the naming I'd like to adopt the naming scheme of the official packages (e. g. https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/jdk7-openjdk/) and keep java7-oracle package (and the derived packages).

Previously, java8-oracle was merged into jdk [1]. If we take the new naming convention, then both the jdk [1] and jre [2] packages should be renamed also. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/jdk/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/jre/ -- Nuno Araujo http://www.russo79.com