[aur-requests] [PRQ#11677] Orphan Request for gtimelog
mxmehl [1] filed a orphan request for gtimelog [2]: Package is out-of-date since at least March. Here's an updated PKGBUILD which should just work fine. I wasn't able to contact Freso unfortunately... # Maintainer: Frederik “Freso” S. Olesen <archlinux@freso.dk> # Contributor: Bartłomiej Piotrowski <bpiotrowski@archlinux.org> pkgname=gtimelog pkgver=0.11 pkgrel=1 pkgdesc='Small GTK+ app for keeping track of your time' arch=('any') url='https://gtimelog.org/' license=('GPL') depends=('python' 'python-gobject' 'python-setuptools') source=("https://github.com/gtimelog/$pkgname/archive/${pkgver}.tar.gz") md5sums=('b160ab912900ad7f1950ac59deeb0e2c') package() { cd "$pkgname-$pkgver" python setup.py install --root="$pkgdir" --optimize=1 } [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/mxmehl/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/gtimelog/
Den 04-06-2018 kl. 10:42 skrev notify@aur.archlinux.org:
Package is out-of-date since at least March. Here's an updated PKGBUILD which should just work fine. I wasn't able to contact Freso unfortunately...
How/where did you try? I can't find any e-mails from you (or anyone else on the mehl.mx domain) neither on the address used for the git commits (the one I'm sending this mail from) or the one mentioned in the "Maintainer" line of the PKGBUILD. I'm also pretty much online 100% of the time on IRC (even if not currently in any Arch channels), and I'm fairly sure I haven't received any `/query`/`/msg` from you. Either way, the package is updated now as well as gotten some improvements on top of that. -- Namasté, Frederik “Freso” S. Olesen <https://freso.dk/> AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Freso Wiki: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User:Freso
On 06/05/2018 12:21 AM, Frederik “Freso” S. Olesen via aur-requests wrote:
Either way, the package is updated now as well as gotten some improvements on top of that.
Speaking of which, you're using the ugly "public" links containing hashes, instead of the distribution packaging-friendly redirector described in https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Python_package_guidelines#PyPI_download... https://pypi.python.org/packages/source/${_name:0:1}/${_name}/${_name}-${pkgver}.tar.gz is so much more friendly, isn't it? -- Eli Schwartz Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
Den 05-06-2018 kl. 06:34 skrev Eli Schwartz via aur-requests:
On 06/05/2018 12:21 AM, Frederik “Freso” S. Olesen via aur-requests wrote:
Either way, the package is updated now as well as gotten some improvements on top of that.
Speaking of which, you're using the ugly "public" links containing hashes, instead of the distribution packaging-friendly redirector described in https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Python_package_guidelines#PyPI_download...
https://pypi.python.org/packages/source/${_name:0:1}/${_name}/${_name}-${pkgver}.tar.gz
is so much more friendly, isn't it?
It really is! I hadn't realised they had (re)introduced a "friendly" download URL. I guess I need to revisit the packaging guidelines more often… :p Thanks for the heads up! Feel free to let me know if you see anything else that could be improved. :) -- Namasté, Frederik “Freso” S. Olesen <https://freso.dk/> AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Freso Wiki: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User:Freso
Request #11677 has been accepted by Eschwartz [1]: maintainer updated [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Eschwartz/
On 06/05/2018 12:34 AM, notify--- via aur-requests wrote:
Request #11677 has been accepted by Eschwartz [1]:
maintainer updated
Um, whoops. Not to worry, this was the close early form, and I accidentally clicked close too soon (without switching the form selection to rejected), but that form doesn't actually orphan the package... -- Eli Schwartz Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
participants (3)
-
Eli Schwartz
-
Frederik “Freso” S. Olesen
-
notify＠aur.archlinux.org